Home

Advertisement

jdbuzz
24 April 2008 @ 11:25 am
Symbolism  

Swastikas, US flags and Olympic torches. Crucifixes and pictures of Allah. All symbols.

They represent love, devotion, hatred or death and people get so worked up about them. yet they are just... symbols, inanimate representations.

This Olympic torch stuff is really annoying the crap out of me. It is a bloody torch for fuck's sake! the media in all forms have humanised the thing.

"The torch was whisked away to safety overnight"

"The torch was welcomed to Australia by..."

and so on.

I'm just waiting for the torch to develop a bloody headache one day soon and decide not to go out jogging.....

This whole Olympic thing is one big yawn to me. Some of the sports are enjoyable but not that many.

As for Olympic ideals... They clearly died for the majority of people when professionalism took over.

Furthermore, I think every four years is far too often to have to endure the opening and closing ceremonies and why can't we put in place a total news embargo on the Olympics until say a week before the games start?

Miserable killjoy ain't I?

;-)

 
 
John is feeling: bored
John is listening to: The Circle Game
 
 
jdbuzz
21 April 2008 @ 04:06 pm
2020 (Tele) Vision  

So the gabfesting is over and the idealists God bless 'em are winging their way back to obscurity. I don't mind people wanting to change the world for the better and I really don't intend this to be a criticism of their good intentions. However...

What is 2020 really going to be like? What is achieved by inviting Corporate Australia Ltd. and the multimedia whores to a weekend chat?

Do you actually trust people whose primary claim to fame is the siphoning off of your wealth into their bulging pockets? I don't. The media are a subsidiary of Corporate Australia Ltd. and they represent their parent company magnificently. Our leading politicians have to bare their arses to Corporate Australia or they will be hounded out of office by an army of sheep, whipped into a frenzy by their media subsidiary. 

If we could transport now to 2020, I think you would be horrified by what you see. In the same way, if you were taken from 1978 and dropped into 2008, you would be equally horrified. There would be some amazement at the technological advances and sure, a lot of that is driven by business. I ask you though, at what price progress?

2020? I see even more of the same x 100. People who have no opinion other than that which is shoved into them by the media. I see a society where you dare not set out of your door without a can of mace, a knife and a personal alarm.  I see a society were we spend so much of our resources on human offal, that we can't afford to look after those who have put their lives on the line for us. I see a society where even more of the government is sold off to Corporate Australia. The balance sheet rules now and will rule stronger in 2020.

Seriously, what is your vision of 2020? Not what you would like to see, but rather what will you see?



What do you see for Australian society in 2020? How will it change?

 
 
John is feeling: pessimistic
John is listening to: In The Year 2525
 
 
jdbuzz
28 March 2008 @ 04:00 pm
2020 Vision Gabfest  
The people who read this blog, like me are all laymen or laywomen if you like. (Some of you rather enjoy the laying part too). 

What do you make of this conference? James Hird, Hugh Jackman, James Packer and an actress by the name of Claudia Karvan (sorry but I've never heard of her. Memo to self: Must read more women's glossies).

James Packer, failed business entrepreneur when he was allowed his first joint venture into the world of commerce. James Packer, the lucky son-of-a-total prick who now heads an empire built by his two past ancestral generations. James Packer, the scientologist who no doubt awaits the arrival of the scientologically prophesised space ship to take him to eternal life. I wonder if they will allow him to take his silver spoon with him? 

James Hird? Well, perhaps. I don't know really how I feel about the whole thing. There will always be people who you don't think are worthy of this post. 

Naturally, the populists have been at work and it will (they obviously hope) buy favour with the populace.

For me, I just think I am becoming rather too cynical these days. Nothing, absolutely nothing will come from the conference except constipated visions and a phony 'we care what you think' big brother love-in from our Canberra government. 

Isn't the theory behind voting for pollies that you actually can talk to them and through them, and achieve what you want? James Hird doesn't talk for me and James Packer can blow it out his arse sideways with acid spray. 

This is a waste of time and money and I defy anyone to show me in time to come what was achieved by it.

When do the plebs get to be heard? (Not James) 
 
 
John is feeling: cynical
John is listening to: Talk Too Much
 
 
jdbuzz
26 February 2008 @ 05:31 pm
Political Party Parasites  
There is news today that a number of parliamentary members of the Federal opposition are contemplating retirement from the hallowed halls of Canberra. 

It would seem that sitting on the opposition benches puts giant splinters up your rectum, and after so many years of holding the reigns from the ermine-lined seating of the government side of the house, this is just not palatable. Their Labor counterparts do exactly the same thing when they lose an election.

Now, I don't know about you, but this sooky sooky la la reaction to losing government annoys me more than words can say. We are a mere matter of months into a new term of office, and people are jumping ship and inflicting the electors of Australia with the considerable expense of a number of by-elections. 

Furthermore, because both sides do it with annoying regularity, there is no likelihood that any penalty will ever be attached to these contemptuous pigs. They sit in parliament and rake in enormous benefits (which they are allowed to enjoy like no other Australian is allowed to) and then they thumb their nose at you when they have had enough.

Isn't it time this practice was stopped? Isn't it time we demanded that just a little respect was shown to the electors of this country?

I know pollies work hard during their term of office but this these are positions of great trust and prestige that were pursued by the candidates with great vigour and almost without exception - for their greater glory and edification.

This is another fine example of why I hate politicians. They may not be corrupt per se, but they thrive within a systemically corrupted environment of their own creation.



 
 
 
John is feeling: angry
John is listening to: I Hate Fucking Pollies
 
 
jdbuzz
29 December 2007 @ 01:17 pm
Hick Up For Free Speech  
I can't wait for the 30 March 2008. 

After six years of illegal incarceration and being denied the freedoms we obviously took for granted, David Hicks will be able to speak. 

This poor individual was set free from his concentration camp only because he agreed to publicly lie about his sense of guilt. He came back to Australia, and as a condition of his release, he is unable to say anything at all about his arrest and subsequent mistreatment until 30 March 2008.

There are a lot of people who have voiced there contempt and disgust for this man in the media. People are suggesting that he should be denied unemployment benefits (as if starving to death might be preferable than trying to assimilate him back into society). I rather hope that the people who wish him such misfortunes are a moronic minority. 

It concerns me that people choose to see him as guilty just because he was an activist for a cause that they don't happen to believe in. I don't believe in it either, but there appears to be no evidence that he committed any act of terrorism against Australia or the United States. 

After five years in Guantanamo Bay, I can also forgive him for sacrificing his principles. I do not however, forgive those who incarcerated him, nor do I forgive the cowardly and sycophantic politicians of this country who chose in the main, not to actively pursue his release. It strikes at the heart of those supposedly cherished ideals of democracy and freedom.

And I am concerned that someone may yet do a 'Bhutto' on him before we hear him speak.
 
 
Location:: Guantanamo bay
John is feeling: disappointed
John is listening to: Please Release Me
 
 
jdbuzz
28 December 2007 @ 09:30 am
Peace On Mother Earth  

This 'peace on earth, goodwill to man' stuff didn't last very long did it? 

A man in his 50s was playing beach cricket in Geraldton and was beaten to death by one of this state's many aboriginal thugs. His granddaughter's fiance is in hospital after been glassed with a broken bottle. That was Christmas Day. 

Last night, a man was stabbed to death at Perth Central Bus Station and Benazir Bhutto was assassinated in Pakistan. 

It's business as usual, so it seems.

I'm developing a new thought process in regard to the future of the world. Now I'm not a super greenie nor am I frivolous with mother earth's resources. I try to do my bit for the environment but don't get carried away with it. Probably the way most of us are I suspect. I don't like waste, and I guess that is the major driving force behind any acts that could be described as 'green'. 

I have however, been considering the future of the earth for a while and I'm starting to think that trying to drastically change the lifestyle of the species known as 'human' will have about as much impact as a fart in gale force wind. 

Why do we want to save the earth? For who, for what? The place is doomed and that is simply the cyclic nature of all things. Sooner or later each of the species of this planet will either be destroyed or mutated to a point where identification by us would be impossible. 

Why save the earth for us? Why are we worth it? As a species we are unique in that we are clearly the most dominant of all living things. Whether this warrants saving the earth just for our benefit though doesn't convince me or compel me to make that extra effort. It is pointless and anyway, I think we are unworthy of eternal presence upon this landscape. 

We are dinosaurs with blinkers, made of metaphoric dust - and dust we shall be once more. 

Saving the earth is unnecessary because when all is said and done, she looks after herself. Those aboard her are - and always were - doomed.

 
 
John is feeling: thoughtful
John is listening to: War of the Worlds
 
 
jdbuzz
23 November 2007 @ 09:08 am
The Last Hump  

  No people, I am not about to swear off sex, it is simply that this is the last day before the federal election and I just want to say that I have seldom been so disappointed in the calibre of the two main parties.  

 

 


In youth I was all-embracing of the Labor Party - to the point where I was an office bearer of my local branch. Menzies and his successors had taken Australia nowhere and it really was time for a change. The party had very different ideals and policies to the Liberals and the working man (or woman) was at the fulcrum of its platform.

Somewhere along the way the party has been seduced by media moguls and in so doing it has been diluted to the point where it now seems to support any movement except the working man. It even expels union members who stand up for the workers. If you're an lesbian, peace loving environmentalist then you will no doubt be welcomed with open arms. Dare you actually have a meaningful job, earn a wage and earn less than $250,000 per annum, then they don't want to know you. YOU can't do anything for THEM. The party is so similar to the Liberals that they even cloned John Howard, called it 'Kevin Rudd' and put it at the helm. The ALP talk about dismantling the Liberal's labour laws is clouded with qualifications and evasiveness. To be honest, even that aside, just what is the difference?

The party system allows for powerful representation of policy and it prevents the country stagnating in a sea of minority interests such as happens in the Italian model. Unfortunately, it no longer works as it did. Howard and Rudd wear the same pair of trousers and both are quite happy to have their hands in the pockets, scratching their balls while all the time kissing Murdoch and his colleagues' arse.

Politicians are about getting elected and making a name for themselves. The only thing visionary that a politician sees is his retirement after 10 years on an overblown superannuation payment that they alone can access regardless before the normal retirement age.

We need alternatives with clout and I think I am going green tomorrow. At least they may wrest away the balance of power in the senate.



 
 
John is feeling: complacent
John is listening to: I Don't Know How To Love Him
 
 
jdbuzz
21 November 2007 @ 11:24 am
Sexist Pigs  
I like the concept of equality. Equality for people of all races, creed and yes - even gender. 

There are those amongst us (well people in women's action groups) who still tout their belief that women earn less than men for the same work. A simple look at the facts would put pay to that lie but then, why let the facts get in the way of a good story? 

Certainly, women are denied some promotional opportunities in their careers and as a result, their capacity to earn is affected. In my experience though, (and through years of management across a number of work environments, I consider it vast)  that usually comes about because of decisions that have been made to have a family and put the career on the back burner. I think it is admirable that they do and I certainly don't think that the job of motherhood should be treated with anything less than total admiration and gratitude when you see the job done well. God knows, it gets harder and harder doesn't it?

Perhaps with progressing stem cell research, we may get to the stage one day where we can deny nature, and men rather than women can do all that is required to nurture a child to adulthood. Maybe then women can be treated the same as men. In the meantime however, it is best to accept that which nature commands and get over it. 

Now the point of this preamble ramble was to bring to your attention this little nugget and then to pose you a question:

From the Sunday Times 'Perth Now'

"Liza Kappelle

November 20, 2007 07:32pm

A FORMER teacher has escaped immediate jail after succumbing to her love for a troubled student and having lesbian sex in bushland in Perth.

Elizabeth Anne Crothers, 50, received a two-year jail term, suspended for two years, in the Perth district court yesterday after a jury found her guilty on one count of indecent dealing and one count of sexual penetration.

In WA, lesbian sex is legal at 16, but the age of consent rises to 18 when one of the couple is in a position of authority over the other - as in a teacher-student relationship.

Crothers was tried on 21 counts of indecent dealing or sexual penetration of a pupil in her care between November 1998 to March 1999.

She admitted having a full sexual relationship with the teenager but insisted it happened only after the girl left school in March 1999.

A jury yesterday cleared Crothers on 19 charges but found her guilty on one count of indecent dealing and one count of sexual penetration.

Those charges related to Crothers digitally penetrating the girl and allowing the teen to digitally penetrate her in bushland in Perth's hills in February 1999.

The girl told the court she shared her first sexual experience with Crothers who seduced her when she was a troubled student.

Crothers, a mother of two, admits she was stupid to meet a student outside school."

Question:  Change the gender of the perpetrator, and tell me what the sentencing outcome would be.

 
 
John is feeling: curious
John is listening to: I Am Woman
 
 
jdbuzz
16 November 2007 @ 04:21 pm
Ruddiculous  
Our politicians take us for fools though I have no doubt that we often give them good reason to. 

I've been listening to a Labor party advertisement all week on radio. In it, a woman who has obviously been given the script, touts the dangers of not voting for Labor. To not vote Labor means that you'll be voting for Peter Costello to become the prime minister. "Well I don't want to vote for Costello to be Prime Minister!" says this buffoon - or words to that effect. 

("Well, we didn't vote for you" & "Dennis, there's some lovely filth over 'ere!" come to mind).

Newsflash! you dumbarsed fuckwits. You don't vote for prime ministers. Unless you happen to be in Costello's electorate, then you won't have chance to vote for him at all. 

I can't abide this sort of deliberately sloppy campaigning and it annoys me because I think it assumes we can't figure out the difference between policy and personality.

Unless things have changed in the Westminster style of voting (and nobody told me), you actually vote for a candidate. The Prime Minister is selected by the party (or a coalition of parties and or independents) that usually holds the majority of seats. 

I abhor the fact that we are edging closer to this presidential style of politics. All the giant banners, dancing girls, brass bands and elector-funded advertising campaigns in the world can not mask the fact that party politics is awash with career politicians trained to smile benignly at you while they lie through those gleaming white teeth.
 
 
John is feeling: annoyed
John is listening to: Would I Lie To You Baby?
 
 
jdbuzz
04 November 2007 @ 10:59 am
Hype Is Trype  

A huge announcement was made today by the Western Australian State Minister for Hype THE HON SHEILA M McHALE MLA. :

"Perth wins 2011 ISAF Sailing World Championships"

Sheila is - amongst many things titular, the Minister for Tourism. (She is also the Minister for Culcha and the Yarts). Sheila was quoted on radio this morning as saying that this will "help put WA on the map".  Well, whoopee-bloody-do.

I swear if I hear this hackneyed phrase just one more time I will blow the frigging place up and take us right off this bloody all-important map.  

Brother Peter (No, he's not a monk - and he isn't the Messiah either) mentioned herehis opinion regarding the Red Bull Air Race. I am compelled to agree. Much ado about very little. 

From my perspective, I'm sick to death of being inconvenienced with road closures and alternate plans just to go about my everyday existence while these much-hyped events are in session. 

Be honest, how many of you had even heard of the bloody Red Bull Air Race prior to it arriving in Perth last year? As I sit at home this Sunday morning all I have heard is the constant drone of planes zooming down the river. It sounds like some great lawn mower gig in the sky. 

I think some of this stuff is overkill. I work shift work from the Hyatt Building and over the course of the past few years I've been put out greatly by Christmas pageants, cycle races, sky shows, car rallies, Red Bull planes and Anzac Day. 

Now, I don't mind the inconvenience of a couple of these events and you might guess which they are, but I am fed up with the tourist dollar being touted as the lifeblood of this state and having to make sacrifices for that very reason . It is not - and never was our lifeblood. 

The people who organise these events are very good spin doctors and governments of the day are astute enough to realise that they have to jump on board or be trampled underfoot. How I pity the poor people of Sydney for what they went through for the Johnny and George show!

Specifically, I guess I don't greatly object to this air show,  but I'll be damned if I am going to overrate it's value to this state. It's economic and marketing significance is about as great as mine, and yet you don't see me heralded in the media and see streets roped off for my dazzling arrival at the Hyatt Centre. 

I do it on an almost daily basis too.

 
 
John is feeling: cynical
John is listening to: Those Magnificent Men In Their Flying Machines
 
 
jdbuzz
28 October 2007 @ 10:33 am
The Living Daylights  
I think that there are two main issues that really irritate me about daylight saving and I have been trying to understand why it is people are so damn passionate about the subject, present company included. 

Firstly, I don't need it and yet against our previously well documented wishes, it has been foisted upon us. It could have waited until an election, but those esteemed wankers such as Derazio, Quigley and Birney chose to push it through parliament because they feared they were losing a public profile. Perhaps it was more a case of them wishing to divert from an unwelcomed type of focus that was on them. Who knows for sure?

The second issue for me I guess, is the automatic assumption that because you are 'anti' daylight saving, then you are an idiot. I'm not an idiot (well, not all the time) and I really resent the smug disposition that the 'pro' lobby employ to trivialise your argument. 

I don't like daylight saving. I am not a sun worshiper and I prefer the cooler climes of spring, winter and autumn. I don't run a national or international business and if I am another hour out of sync with the Eastern states then I couldn't give a flying rat's arse. In this day and age of computer networks and internet communication who needs it? If that was any sort of issue, then we should ALL move towards a central time zone shouldn't we? Maybe that make too much sense.

It has no bearing or impact on the efficient enjoyment of my life. Changing to daylight saving however does. Some of them may be small, but then - what the hell difference does it make? In my life, there is nothing that it does for me. Period. So why should I embrace it? It is a personal opinion on a matter of personal preference of course and that is at the core of the debate for people. I can not be convinced otherwise about daylight saving because I simply don't see the need for an unnecessary change and disruption to my life style. To say it is minor is again, a matter of opinion and anyway, why should I (for instance) cross a road just because you want me to walk on the other side? Why is that alone a good enough reason for me to go out of my way?

Have I ever told you that I really hate politicians? They look upon us with the contempt of the smug and the self-righteous.



 
 
 
John is feeling: sleepy
John is listening to: What A Difference A Day Makes
 
 
jdbuzz
14 October 2007 @ 09:09 am
Parliament To Be Dissolved  

I have just heard breaking news that The Governor General is about to dissolve parliament.

I think an olympic-size swimming pool full of concentrated hydrochloric acid should do the trick.

Tags:
 
 
John is feeling: Flippant
 
 
jdbuzz
09 October 2007 @ 10:38 am
Death Becomes You  
Kevin Rudd is full of shit, and I have long stated that I don't trust the man. I don't trust Howard either, but at least I know his politics and I know what he is capable of. With Rudd, I am concerned about what he doesn't tell us. 

It is interesting to watch him back-pedal over capital punishment.  From The Australian:

Rudd junks McClelland plan

"In a speech last night Robert McClelland outlined how a Labor government would start a regional campaign to stop all executions in Asia, but a mere 15 hours after it was delivered, Mr Rudd said the United Nations was the appropriate forum for raising the issue. 

"When it comes to the question of the death penalty, no diplomatic intervention will ever be made by any government that I lead in support of any individual terrorist life. We have only indicated in the past, and will maintain a policy in the future, of intervening diplomatically in support of Australian nationals who face capital sentences abroad,’’ Mr Rudd said today

Mr Rudd's decision to distance himself from the speech has raised questions about the actions of his office which usually vets speeches made by Opposition spokespeople.

This morning Mr Rudd said a staff member was being "counselled" for not identifying issues with Mr McClelland's speech.

"I also understand ... that a person in my own office saw the text of the speech but didn't identify this part of it,'' he said. That staff member is also being counselled," Mr Rudd said."

Oh the hypocrisy of it all. 

It took 15 hours for Rudd to refute this speech and it comes after Australians woke up this morning and started voicing their dismay at Labor's position on it. 

So what do you do when faced with an election-damaging exposure of your policy? You deny it and lay the blame at the feet of one of your ministers and one of the poor underlings in your own office. What an complete and utter bullshitting bastard he is. 

The Labor Party is as big a fraud as the Liberal Party. I think we need a real third alternative. I might just have to create one. What are my policies on a range of issues? I guess I need to create a manifesto.
Tags:
 
 
John is feeling: annoyed
John is listening to: It All Sounds Like Bullshit To Me
 
 
jdbuzz
22 June 2007 @ 11:34 am
The ALP - A Rudderless Ship  
I am no fan of corrupt union figures. I am no fan of corruption full stop. Joe McDonald could spontaneously combust and it wouldn't be my urinary flow that would douse the flames. 

I am however somewhat disgusted that the ALP is about to oust him from their ranks. For what?

For using bad language on a union site and being in the face of company officials? Spare me their sensibilities. If Joe McDonald was fronting up to a kindergarten teacher in front of her pupils I could perhaps find something to quarrel about, but to be representing the interests of his members on a building site for Christ's sake?

This is the ALP as we know it today. Led by an academic,  populated by academics and way too many conflicting minority interests. It has no vision and it follows no path. It provides no illumination to an ever-increasing population of disenfranchised voters. 

This same party is the one that fought tooth and nail to hide the involvement of the disgraceful Brian Burke and his band of dishonest, despicable, dim-witted toadies as they fought to wield influence and power within their ranks. The backroom brawls and jockeying for position were known to all, yet they tolerated it. 

Now Joe gets the flick. Maybe he deserves it - but not for the reason stated. This is a cop-out that reflects poorly upon the ethics of this shambles of a party. A party I once belonged to. 

There is something about Kevin Rudd that I do not like and i think it is everything.  

The man is just a front. It is the politics of personality. You get no more bang for your bucks just because a party leader can speak eloquently and smile as they lie to you. 
 
 
John is feeling: annoyed
John is listening to: Would I Lie To You?
 
 
jdbuzz
21 June 2007 @ 01:21 pm
Are We There Yet?  

From the West Australian:
Monkeys yield embryonic stem cells

20th June 2007, 16:31 WST

 

Human therapeutic cloning has moved a step closer, with US researchers successfully creating embryonic stem cells from monkey embryos.

In a world-first breakthrough, scientists told a stem cell research conference in Cairns this week that they had successfully created two batches of embryonic stem cells from cloned rhesus monkey embryos.

 

Why clone animal cells for use in human bodies? This is the thinking of unimaginative minds surely? 

I say we should clone human cells for use in animal bodies! We need never do anything again. The animals could do everything for us. Imagine the future!

We could have gorillas working as security guards. A goose as prime minister and a wombat as leader of the opposition!

We could have lizards and sharks as captains of industry and an elephant as a union leader.

We could have a pack of hyenas working for the press and a dodo as president of the US of A.

Oh... hang on! Too late!
 
 
John is feeling: good
John is listening to: Talk To The Animals
 
 
jdbuzz
31 May 2007 @ 09:20 am
How To Offend Indonesia? Try To Tell The Truth  
News reports abound about Indonesia's Jakarta governor who cut short his trip when asked to attend the inquiry concerning the 1975 killing of five journalists. Three of them were Australians. 

Apparently we have offended the Indonesians. Again. "Petrified excreta to that", says I.

We all know the journalists were killed by Indonesian troops. The excuse that they were killed in crossfire has worn thinner than John Howard's hair over the years. The Australian government of the day and all governments since, have stuck their collective heads in the sand over this crime, believing that political expediency is more important than the deaths of its own citizens. 

Now we are kowtowing once more for fear of upsetting the Indonesians.

These people are murderers and almost as big a crime as the killing of the reporters is the crime perpetrated by the governments of Australia in abandoning its own citizens because of concerns about the status of its relationship with another country.

I continue to be thoroughly disgusted and ashamed of this country's record in this scandalous tragedy..
Tags:
 
 
John is feeling: & disgusted
John is listening to: As Time Goes By
 
 
jdbuzz
14 May 2007 @ 07:03 pm
No Apple For The Teacher From Little Johnny  
I've just heard John Howard dipping his oar into matters of education. He reckons that school principals should have more autonomy in the appointment to teaching positions - and the removal of teachers from those positions.

I really have to question why this sort of opinion even gets airplay. He is entitled to his opinion but let's be honest, his opinion is no more valid than anybody else's and I can imagine the various state teacher bodies coming out very quickly and telling him to butt out. 

It is hard enough as it is to get teachers to stay in their vocation and this imbecile suddenly spouting forth his opinion on operational matters of education is of no help to anybody. 

You just have to think there is a hidden agenda here.
Tags:
 
 
John is feeling: apathetic
John is listening to: To Sir With Love
 
 
jdbuzz
19 April 2007 @ 09:31 am
A Uniform Approach  
Unions WA have taken up sponsorship of a junior soccer club and the sky is apparently falling.
The West Australian tells us:

The sponsorship of a junior soccer club which will result in children wearing shirts emblazoned with union slogans is "sick", federal Sports Minister George Brandis says.

The club is the Tuart Hill Soccer Club and Unions WA have contributed $8,800 towards their various teams of children aged between 6 and 15.

Senator Brandis said the club's players were being used to carry political propaganda. "This is unacceptable," Senator Brandis told ABC Radio in Brisbane. "It is sick to be requiring school kids as a condition of playing sport to be carrying political propaganda on their jerseys."

The union sponsorship was not the same as any normal sponsorship as some parents are likely to disagree with the political message being put forward by unions, Senator Brandis said. "I think people as a matter of common sense can tell the difference between ordinary commercial advertising and political propaganda," he said. "I think most Australians would accept that a line has to be drawn between the two - that you don't use kids unwillingly to carry political propaganda."

Apparently, it is okay to allow a company that sells grossly overpriced sports shoes made by underpaid, third-world vassals emblazon their product over the back of your children. It is also okay for them to advertise the providers of junk food across their ever-increasing girths. Its just not okay to promote an involvement and interest in an organisation that is there to fight for their working future in an environment where the union movement is being continually attacked and legislated against by the government of the day. 

I think Senator Brandis needs a size 14 Nike Air up his fat arse. 'Just do it'.

 
 
John is feeling: okay
John is listening to: These Boots Are Made For Kicking
 
 
jdbuzz
16 March 2007 @ 10:43 am
Our Backdoor Boy  
John Howard bravely dropped in unannounced to Southern Iraq and visited the troops. 

What a morale booster that would be! What bravery to rock up there and not tell the enemy of his arrival!

The man's a legend... A bloody legend.
Tags:
 
 
John is listening to: Brave Brave Sir Robin
 
 
jdbuzz
13 March 2007 @ 04:11 pm
Judge Not, That Ye Be Not Judged  
I wrote a blog entry recently (here) in which I criticised the David Hicks' upcoming trial fiasco. I commented that there was "ne'er a sign of twelve good men and true to offer some level of impartiality to the process."

Brother Peter responded with criticism of the jury system. While he has his own view of it based upon his experiences I have a somewhat different view and I suppose it is timely to weight up the merits and demerits of our jury system.  

In France (so I am led to believe) they have no jury. Cases are heard instead in front of a panel of magistrates. In China they have no jury either but that comes as no surprise to you I'm sure. 

The jury system we have at its best, is as impartial as it can be from the influences and bias of the law, the judiciary and the government.  Unfortunately It also means that complex cases and perhaps at times even some some not-so complex cases, can be steamrolled by the ignorance and bias of a minority of jurors. You can't always fit the complexities of a legal case into a two minute slot for the television news either, and if you really think that a miscarriage of justice has occurred when you read of, or hear of a jury decision, then sift through the court papers instead. Better still, sit in court and watch the proceedings. 

Without a jury, there is a real risk that the legal system can be manipulated by government. It threatens our very freedom. God knows, we don't have a free press despite what we are told and to hand over all the processes of justice to the judiciary makes me very uneasy indeed. Government appointed judges with a particular slant has become an increasingly worrying issue. People talk with resigned acceptance about which side of the spectrum each of our High Court appointees represents and we surely know that such biased political appointeeism is a way of lfe. We are governed by a mostly benign fascist cartel of multinationals and other assorted arse-lickers.

On the other hand, what can a jury of ordinary people add to a complex commercial case? Not much. Granny Miggins, who  surrendered all the bill paying to her husband from the day she got married 35 years ago, is likely unqualified to take in the issues and legalities of a complex financial fraud. A lot of people aren't, and yet we demand (under law) that they do . 

I think I would be happy to accept a compromise. Why not allow certain cases to be heard by a jury of (at least some)experts in the field? Perhaps we could even allow a jury of my much cherished 'twelve good men and true' to decide if a case is heard by a panel? 

Some changes certainly need to be made. I don't see why we can't question that tradition alone, is no reason to continue devalued time -honoured practices.

Peter may well not support such a concept as he leans so far to the right on this issue he would actually recommend the execution of anyone who has ever sat on a jury. Still, I think that there is a germ of a reasonable idea in this. 

And on another note, it really is about time that 'Livejournal' included the word 'blog' and it's various derivatives in its spell-checker!
Tags:
 
 
John is feeling: creative
John is listening to: I Shot The Sheriff
 
 
jdbuzz
27 February 2007 @ 11:27 am
31 Years On... Not Exactly A Ray Of Light Shines.  

Conspiracy:


A dictionary definition:

1.the act of conspiring.
2.an evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious plan formulated in secret by two or more persons; plot.
3.a combination of persons for a secret, unlawful, or evil purpose: He joined the conspiracy to overthrow the government.
4.Law. an agreement by two or more persons to commit a crime, fraud, or other wrongful act.
5.any concurrence in action; combination in bringing about a given result.

and so to the West Australian again: 

The bodies of the Balibo Five journalists were "reduced to ashes" after they were killed, according to an intercept seen by a retired Australian Defence Signals Directorate (DSD) official. 

Giving evidence before a Sydney inquest into the death of Brian Peters, one of five Australian-based journalists killed during Indonesia's 1975 occupation of East Timor, the former DSD intelligence officer Adrian Bishop was questioned about a string of intercepts he saw in October 1975.

The Indonesian military signal intercepts referred to the death of five white people in Balibo, Mr Bishop told the Glebe Coroner's Court.

Official government reports have said the five journalists were killed on October 16, 1975 in crossfire between Indonesian forces and Fretilin troops in Balibo.

Several East Timorese witnesses have told the inquest the men were executed and their bodies burnt.
Mr Bishop is the latest commonwealth official to give evidence of seeing intercepts referring to the deaths of the journalists.

The inquest continues, but in a closed court, after Deputy State Coroner Dorelle Pinch agreed to a commonwealth government request to hear some evidence in camera, as it may prejudice Australia's national security and defence interests

Okay, hands up who remembers this? Of course you do.  31 years later and it is now getting some official confirmation of truth. 31 years of lies, stonewalling and deception. 31 years of all flavours of government denying us confirmation of that which we all suspected. 31 years of pandering to a military dictatorship, a regime that thrived on corruption and brutality. 

This cost Australians their lives and yet we still have to endure some of the evidence being heard in camera. One suspects it is only because it would serve to embarrass and annoy our northern neighbour. They are murderous thugs and successive Australian governments have conspired to keep in sweet with them.  

Why is this information being confirmed from official sources now - some 31 years of torment after the event? Do they expect that we will have lost our indignation and anger by now? Is it a story that  is no longer a major headline grabber? 

Time heals all (It seems to cure public outrage anyway) and we as a community are complicit in allowing this to go the way of so much that is really important. 

31 years we have been lied to by our federal politicians and are we to allow them to do this without even comment and criticism?

Tags:
 
 
John is feeling: furious even
John is listening to: Everybody Wants To Rule The World
 
 
jdbuzz
12 February 2007 @ 01:30 pm
John Howard (not) For President!  
I am sure that the pictures we see of John Howard are being tampered with by spin doctors. His hair should surely be brown and not grey. When you have your head that far up somebody else's arse it would have to be stained in some way. Stained it most certainly is.  

Australian Prime Minister John Howard



From today's BBC:
Australia head slams US candidate 
Australian Prime Minister John Howard has claimed US presidential hopeful Barack Obama's stance on Iraq will benefit those seeking to destroy it.

Mr Obama, currently a Democrat senator, said that US troops should withdraw from the troubled nation next year.

Mr Howard said al-Qaeda should be "praying as many times as possible" for an Obama victory in the 2008 elections.

But Mr Obama reacted by saying Australia should increase its troops in Iraq, if Mr Howard was so concerned

Never trust anyone who isn't big enough to admit to their mistakes. This man has contributed to the deaths of more people than Osama Bin Laden.  Given a few more years in Iraq and he may yet reach the dizzy heights of Saddam Hussein

Tags:
 
 
John is listening to: Theme from Ghostbusters
 
 
jdbuzz
30 January 2007 @ 01:40 pm
I Swear By Almighty God  
There was a swearing-in ceremony in Canberra today for John Howard's new cabinet. Personally, I would have though a swearing-at ceremony would have been entirely more appropriate.
Tags:
 
 
John is feeling: grumpy
John is listening to: Mind Your Own Business!
 
 
jdbuzz
29 January 2007 @ 02:59 pm
Yes Prime Minister  
Tony Blair is a bloody legend! 

Here he is commanding attention on the world stage once more and this time he is championing the cause of global warming. Clearly not satisfied with ending poverty in Africa, bringing peace between the jews and palestinians and ridding Iraq of weapons of mass distraction, he has set himself this new and lofty goal. 

The man never ceases to amaze me.

Some may see him as being full of self importance - a weak-jawed, poofy pom who is rather more concerned with cementing a place in history than actually trying to do some real good.  Some may even see him as a middle class Twit of the Year candidate who aspires to become an upper class Twit of the Year. Some may well despise the way he can feign concern and seemingly dupe the residents of Britain by pouring his heart out at every possible turn just to show his 'human' side. Some may even believe that he is little more than a clone of that type of Labor politician who has met with great success here in Australia such as Burke, Dunstan or even Hawke. 

Some may also skeptically suggest that the Africa issue and the jewish/palestinian issue have all but been pushed to the back burner as he found another, bigger headline grabber upon which he could strive to dominate the world media. Others may well reflect on the belief that he doesn't come up with ideas but is merely very good at jumping on the bandwagon and hollering the loudest about his brand of snake oil,

Who could be that cynical?
Tags:
 
 
John is feeling: cynical
John is listening to: Sarah Brightman
 
 
jdbuzz
23 January 2007 @ 10:29 am
Here Is The Naturalisation Certificate - The Emblem Of Our Land  

Australia day is fast approaching. It is a time for reflecting and enjoying all that is Australian and unique. 

Sadly I will be working all day but that won't stop me (at least in spirit) being out there with the multitude, wearing my traditional Aussie thongs (made in Sri Lanka), waving my Aussie flag (made in China) belting out 'I Come From A Land Down Under' on my Japanese Ghetto-blaster (made in Indonesia).  

I may have a brief respite from such exuberant displays of fierce national pride, to munch on my Vegemite (©Kraft of America) sandwich spread across a couple of slices of (German) rye bread. 

We will gather in numbers, we English, Italians, Chinese and Indians et al, and celebrate that which makes us uniquely Australian thereby setting us apart from all other countries (Mainly that we are not in them).

Multiculturalism was an experiment of the Whitlam years and like the curate's egg, it is good in parts. The parts that are rotten though need to be cut out and discarded like the festering, poisonous scum that it is. 

Lebanese gangs in Sydney, Croats and Serb thugs in Melbourne, North African gangs on the streets of Perth have no place in multicultural Australia.

As Arnie (Austrian-American) would say "Get Out!" (English) and I would be more than happy to hear him also say "Hasta la vista" upon their departure (Spanish).

Tags:
 
 
John is feeling: calm
John is listening to: The Philosophers' Song
 
 
 
 

Advertisement